Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation
tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Singular they [was Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns]"
- Previous message: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Volker Hetzer: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 24 Jan 2005 13:31:24 -0800
Large difference though. We respect the scientific process nowadays.
They didn't back then. That's why people [even with correct theories
and conclusions] were ridiculed.
I mean afterall, the wood burns because it contains fire. This is a
well established fact.
Tom
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Singular they [was Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns]"
- Previous message: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Volker Hetzer: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
