Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation
From: Volker Hetzer (volker.hetzer_at_ieee.org)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Randy Poe: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:23:27 +0100
<jstevh@msn.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:1106499102.060076.243500@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> Ok, that's your choice. But make no mistake, this research could very
> well impact your life, and sooner, not later.
>
> If down the road your simple social fears meant that you did not make
> yourself part of the process and maybe help produce a better outcome,
> then remember that, as your own failure.
>
> But still, often the best beginnings are with failures, if you can
> learn from them.
They laughed at Galileo. They laughed at Copernicus. They laughed at
Columbus. But remember, they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
Greetings!
Volker
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Randy Poe: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
