Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum
From: Michael Brown (see_at_signature.below)
Date: 01/23/05
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Guy Macon's adventures with ASCII character frequency"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- In reply to: Michael Brown: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:04:18 +1100
Michael Brown wrote:
[...]
> How do you get the original primes from the above factorisation? Or
> does j have to be specially chosen?
>From what I can gather, it's supposed to go something like:
b_i = factors of j^2 ( = 16 in this case)
f_i = factors of T (product squared minus j^2)
b_1 = product of some subset of b_i
b_2 = -j^2 / b1
f_1 = product of some subset of f_i
f_2 = T / f_1
A = some integer (not sure how to calculate this)
Then a possible factor is:
(b_1 f_2 + b_2 f_1 + 2 j^2) / A
Since I'm not sure how to calculate A, I just calculated each possibility
mod each of the original primes to see if it was zero. No such combination
occured (except for the trivial cases b_1 = f_1 = 1 or the prime to be
tested was zero).
Is my interpretation correct?
-- Michael Brown www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more :) Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz ---+--- My inbox is always open
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Guy Macon's adventures with ASCII character frequency"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- In reply to: Michael Brown: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|