Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis
From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn_at_null.net)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Next in thread: Dik T. Winter: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Reply: Dik T. Winter: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:40:53 -0500
David C. Ullrich wrote:
> <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote:
>>[...] It's not hard to come
>>up with incorrect, inefficient factoring methods.
> Oh? A google search on "incorrect, inefficient factoring methods"
> returns no hits
It's unlikely that anybody coming up with one would
publish it, promote it on the Internet, and *also*
label it as such.
> Giggle.
Tee hee.
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Next in thread: Dik T. Winter: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Reply: Dik T. Winter: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|