Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis
From: Gib Bogle (bogle_at_ihug.too.much.spam.co.nz)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: Gib Bogle: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Previous message: Tim Smith: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:10:45 +1300
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>jst...@msn.com wrote:
>>
>>>>By way of comparison, using Cygwin on my 2.66Ghz XP box, the
>>
>>"factor"
>>
>>>>command correctly factors 137305167623353 in 202 milliseconds.
>>>
>>>I wrote a prototype test program to test out my new factoring
>
> method.
>
>>No, you solved factoring remember? Your program wasn't a prototype.
>>It was THE solution.
>>
>
>
> No you stupid person. The paper is THE solution, or was supposed to
> be, though my research found I'd found a 50% solution, in that it will
> work 50% of the time, which is astounding in and of itself.
I have a method for predicting the outcome of coin tosses. Well, it
works 50% of the time, which is astounding.
- Next message: Gib Bogle: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Previous message: Tim Smith: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
