Re: Factoring problem, solved

jstevh_at_msn.com
Date: 01/22/05 

Date: 22 Jan 2005 12:21:23 -0800

tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
> jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> > I thought I'd bring this thread back to the subject at hand, as
some
> > posters have pushed it off into a different subject area.
> >
> > Remember the problem I'm talking about is the factoring problem.
>
> Is it? I thought it was an example of why routine head-exams is a
good
> idea for some people.
>
> >
> > More than likely you used some software today that depends on the
> > supposed difficulty of factoring very large numbers.
>
> "supposed difficulty"...
>
> A few days ago you claimed to have solved this "easy problem". Then
> your algorithm turned out to not work. Then you were puzzled. then
it
> was "a half solution" now it's "gotta worth the theory out"...
>
> Well clearly you don't have a solution. So isn't it fair to say it
IS
> a difficult problem to solve?
>
> Tom

Stupid, stupid, stupid, your post is so damn stupid considering how
often I've explained this now.

I have solved the factoring problem.

The algorithm I found theoretically should work well over 90% of the
time.

However, I have a program implementing the algorithm that is heavily
recursive, so that it starts factoring at a worse level.

Some other program used to fully factor T, the surrogate, with the
current algorithm should give a factor over 90% of the time.

There is theory, and there is implementation.

Now you people are not very bright, so you talk here in reply to me as
if this is just some usual not important stuff that typically ends up
on Usenet, but if what I'm saying is true, and I prove it
mathematically, then someone smarter than you can NOW use the
information to factor VERY large numbers, and your chatter will not
change a thing.

And, being stupid does not protect you from the fall-out, if this thing
goes badly.

Some of you may still be calmly telling yourselves that I can't be
right, even as you become penniless.

Your stupidity is not a protection against someone using information
that you choose not to believe.

James Harris

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Factoring problem, solved
    ... Stupid, stupid, stupid, your post is so damn stupid considering how ... I have solved the factoring problem. ... The algorithm I found theoretically should work well over 90% of the ... And, being stupid does not protect you from the fall-out, if this thing ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Innovation, my TSP algorithm and factoring, timelines
    ... Now more recently I came up with an algorithm which I think solves the ... naturally, from thinking I have a break on the factoring problem, I'd ... And doing so I came up with two travelers where one is going backwards ... pick the least cost path, ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: LibTomMath Book
    ... > Oh go F yourself you stupid leprechaun man. ... But it is gives the estimate answer you sorry piece of shit. ... > lot of editing my explanation of the column weight is DEAD on. ... you stupid F I'm trying to implement a new reduction algorithm ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • JSH: Optimal path and the backwards Traveler
    ... impact Internet security where, of course, that answer is a solution ... the factoring problem COULD be solved in a polynomial time solution I, ... chose the Traveling Salesman Problem as it was simple conceptually. ... You run the algorithm, and, of course you can collapse to a single ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Innovation, my TSP algorithm and factoring, timelines
    ... Turns out that there is a lag between pickup of any revolutionary idea ... Now more recently I came up with an algorithm which I think solves the ... naturally, from thinking I have a break on the factoring problem, I'd ... pick the least cost path, ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)