Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum
From: David Kastrup (dak_at_gnu.org)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Next in thread: Richard Henry: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:46:35 +0100
jstevh@msn.com writes:
> Mark Nudelman wrote:
>> jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>> > The original algorithm in my program, will, my current analysis
>> > shows, factor about 50% of the time, which is astounding.
>> I'm not sure why that's astounding. There are lots of algorithms
>> that factor numbers 100% of the time.
>>
>
> Yeah but my algorithm does it in polynomial time.
Polynomial in what? You don't even know what that means. You are
just spurting buzzwords that you feel sound as impressive as what you
think you are doing.
-- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Next in thread: Richard Henry: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
