Re: Singular they [was Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns]
From: Xcott Craver (caj_at_B-r-a-i-n-H-z.com)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: Singular they [was Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns]"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: Singular they [was Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns]"
- Reply: Joe Peschel: "Re: Singular they [was Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:39:56 GMT
Joe Peschel <jpeschel@no.spam.org> wrote:
>
> I'm not kidding. If Xcott knew what he was talking about, he wouldn't be
> asking such silly hypothetical questions.
How the Hell can someone ask a hypothetical question? Surely it would
cease to be hypothetical once I actually really asked it.
Perhaps you mean a rhetorical question? But no, it was not
rhetorical: I seriously want to know your argument for following
these fellows' prescribed usage.
There are many different reasons, after all: perhaps you feel that
we are better off for adopting some standard, however arbitrary;
perhaps you feel that singular "they" is bad for one's brain, leading
to monstrosities like "Is our children learning?"
Or, maybe your views are less pragmatic, and you seriously believe
that the prescribed usage is truly _right_. If so, I want to hear
a convincing argument why.
For that matter, what's the earliest example of anyone declaring
singular "they" improper? Is this a modern trend?
--X
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: Singular they [was Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns]"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: Singular they [was Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns]"
- Reply: Joe Peschel: "Re: Singular they [was Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]