Re: Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work
From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Xcott Craver: "Re: Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:44:22 -0800
> Years ago I believed that math was a different field when it came to
> demonstration, until I found my prime counting function, and talked
> about it, and watched people lie about it.
It was not new. It was not important. It was a joke, really. Has anyone out
it to practicle or theoretical use? Nope!
> Deep down I guess I knew that the same thing would happen with
> factoring.
Yes. Same thing happened... Will you learn from that this time?
> I have my own research, I'm factoring numbers with it, and I can talk
> out the math but it won't matter. People will lie about it.
You are factoring numbers with 50% success rate! You admit that yourself!
And slower and less effective than trial division!!! Whats to lie about? It
is a piece of ***.
> You may lie about it, but someone can use the research, and then they
> can read your email, read your on-line transactions, and basically walk
> in and ruin your life.
Someone can use "the research" and then they can read our email? You have
done no research that could help anyone to do that.
> Sure I have dinky results now, but that doesn't mean that someone else
> couldn't rapidly advance things.
And it does not mean that someone else *could* advance anything from what
you have developed!
> YOU are the people who said that factoring was a hard problem.
Who said that? It is well know that factoring is believed to be hard, but
nobody is claiming to know that it is indeed hard. I am sure that it is at
least very hard for you.
> YOU are the people that the world trusts.
Nope. The people of the world do not look to sci.math for trust!
> YOU are the people who have the information now and are going to do
> nothing to warn, until something breaks.
What information do we have? Just the information that James Harris is a
yamering idiot?
> And when something does break, don't think you'll be able to run away
> from the truth then, as the world as we know it is likely to end.
Yes James.... now take your meds...
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Xcott Craver: "Re: Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]