Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis
From: Bryan Olson (nameless_at_nowhere.org)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 01:25:55 GMT
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
[...]
> I suspect you're just another Usenet poster without a clue who wishes
> to broadcast that to the world.
I'm also the Usenet poster to whom you wrote:
| Yup. You were *exactly* right Bryan, and I want to thank
| you for noticing that and for repeatedly pointing it out.
(Admittedly, that was not your last word on the subject.)
Here, I wrote about your algorithm and about interpreting your
program's results. Why do you insist on making personal attacks?
-- --Bryan
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading