Re: Stream Ciphers and Confusion/Diffusion
From: flip (flip_alpha_at_safebunch.com)
Date: 01/09/05
- Next message: Marcel Martin: "WAS Frobenius, so good?"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Stream Ciphers and Confusion/Diffusion"
- Next in thread: Xcott Craver: "Re: Stream Ciphers and Confusion/Diffusion"
- Reply: Xcott Craver: "Re: Stream Ciphers and Confusion/Diffusion"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Stream Ciphers and Confusion/Diffusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:39:57 -0800
"Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote in message
news:xt2dnVhXWOo5y33cRVn-rQ@comcast.com...
> flip wrote:
> > since stream ciphers are a subset of block ciphers (symmetric ciphers),
>
> Wrong. Stream ciphers are not a subset of block ciphers.
Interesting, they are classified as such in AC2 and on the RSA FAQ (unless I
am really confused about how I read their respective statements).
I have also seen this classification in several other books.
Lastly, I thought the stream ciphers could also act on bytes at a time (just
something less than what a block cipher might be used for). This is why I
thought I understood the classificatiion.
>
> > So, is it possible to define these terms [confusion and diffusion]
> > for both synchronous and asynchronous stream ciphers?
>
> They're not precisely defined terms, and they do apply
> (such as they are) to all ciphers. Some ciphers might
> not exhibit much of one or the other..
>
> > What are the general rules/thoughts for using stream ciphers over block
(or
> > using a block cipher as a stream cipher) and their respective security
> > properties (seems like they are less well understood than block ciphers
> > are).
>
> There are no general rules, but if you need to transmit
> unit smaller than a block as soon as the input data is
> available, you must use a stream cipher, even if you
> have to cobble one together from block-cipher components.
>
> True stream ciphers have received much less attention
> in the open cryptologic community.
- Next message: Marcel Martin: "WAS Frobenius, so good?"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Stream Ciphers and Confusion/Diffusion"
- Next in thread: Xcott Craver: "Re: Stream Ciphers and Confusion/Diffusion"
- Reply: Xcott Craver: "Re: Stream Ciphers and Confusion/Diffusion"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Stream Ciphers and Confusion/Diffusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|