Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
bryanjugglercryptographer_at_yahoo.com
Date: 01/05/05
- Next message: Tom Foolery: "Re: a makeshift hash solution"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: a makeshift hash solution"
- Maybe in reply to: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: infobahn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 4 Jan 2005 19:38:42 -0800
infobahn wrote:
> Yes, it's actually quite a good analogy (except that a safety
> net doesn't slow you down). Just as the safety net is only
> used when everything's gone pear-shaped, so the bounds check
> is completely useless except when the program's already
> bombed.
So if our rope-walker sets up the net, and then doesn't
fall, was the effort wasted?
-- --Bryan
- Next message: Tom Foolery: "Re: a makeshift hash solution"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: a makeshift hash solution"
- Maybe in reply to: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: infobahn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]