Re: A theoretical method to brute force 128 bit RSA in arbitrary time.

From: Jan Panteltje (pNaonStpealmtje_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/03/05 

Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:11:40 GMT

On a sunny day (03 Jan 2005 03:56:09 +0200) it happened Phil Carmody
<thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
<87r7l3qnra.fsf@nonospaz.fatphil.org>:

>Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> On a sunny day (Sun, 02 Jan 2005 11:05:09 -0500) it happened kurt wismer
>> <kurtw@sympatico.ca> wrote in <RYUBd.1650$P%3.132054@news20.bellglobal.com>:
>>
>>
>> >you may be brute forcing rsa in arbitrary time relative to your
>> >personal frame of reference, but not relative to the frame of reference
>> >where the information you uncover could be used...
>> Not correct, 'I' am the user, and in my reference frame I had the answer in
>> 10 seconds.
>
>As someoe recently said - "You need to read up on relativity I think."
>
>Clue - you don't have an inertial reference frame, but you're pretending you do.
Clue: google 'twin paradox Einstein'
(omit the quotes).
23700 results.
In case regarding your age in your timeframe etc... perhaps try this
program?
http://www.geocities.com/thesciencefiles/twin/twinparadox.html

There is an interesting article about Einstein on the nytimes.com website,
how he was right, then somebody convinced him (Hubble's results) he was
wrong, and then only in 1998 when 'dark force' was discovered he turned out
to be right after all (This is about expansion of the universe and a gravity
opposing force).
Anyways the gist is that Einstein was very humbling conceding defeat, while
actually right, so, make of it was you want.

Relevant Pages