Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn_at_null.net)
Date: 12/31/04
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Help needed for a sorting code in the literature"
- Maybe in reply to: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:54:40 -0600
Paul Rubin wrote:
> ... You're correct that the checking
> doesn't /fix/ the bugs, but at least it detects them. That's better
> than letting the program run amok.
Neither one is satisfactory.
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Help needed for a sorting code in the literature"
- Maybe in reply to: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
