Re: Help needed for a sorting code in the literature
frog2000_at_my-deja.com
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Help needed for a sorting code in the literature"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Help needed for a sorting code in the literature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 30 Dec 2004 09:54:26 -0800
One can usuallly bet that it is your implementation that causes the
problem. You must be sure of all terms, conditions and definitions.
The array [0..n-1] or [1..n] is dependent on the specific language and
compiler. Pascal/Delphi can do "zero based arrays" as well as some
forms of BASIC where "option base(0)" would solve your problem. I am
almost sure there MUST be a way to do it in C++/C...
http://speech_for_blind.tripod.com
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Help needed for a sorting code in the literature"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Help needed for a sorting code in the literature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
