Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: Linda Pan: "Inverse Hash Function"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:03:02 +0100
David Wagner wrote:
> Joe Peschel wrote:
>
>>You're making too much of Infobahn's little joke, Dave.
>
>
> Ok, I see now. My apologies. I'm used to ignoring spelling because
> it so rarely is relevant to the intended meaning -- but this was an
> exception. Sorry for my confusion.
Anyway, your post served (also) to counter Gwyn, who claimed
that safety features (like those provided in other PLs) tend
to actually have negative effects on software quality for
analogous reasons (i.e. luring programmers to do sloppy work).
M. K. Shen
- Next message: Linda Pan: "Inverse Hash Function"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading