Re: Help - I'm at wit's end...
From: Joe Peschel (jpeschel_at_no.spam.org)
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: BRG: "Re: Help - I'm at wit's end..."
- Next in thread: Phil Carmody: "Re: Help - I'm at wit's end..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:58:43 -0000
BRG <brg@nowhere.org> wrote in
news:41d33b63$0$51899$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>> Actually its best to explicitly use "rt" or "rb" (t for text, b for
>> binary). Use of "r" on its own is ambiguous - and the results depend
>> on the compiler defaults. Most interpret "r" as "rt",
Mode t?
> but I am aware
>> of at least one C compiler which interprets "r" as "rb".
Which compiler is that?
J
-- __________________________________________ When will Bush be tried for war crimes? "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." --G. W. B. Joe Peschel D.O.E. SysWorks http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm __________________________________________
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: BRG: "Re: Help - I'm at wit's end..."
- Next in thread: Phil Carmody: "Re: Help - I'm at wit's end..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
