Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 12/29/04
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: David Eather: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:07:26 +0100
Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:
> Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
>
>> It may be mentioned that for such real-time applications
>> ADA's tasking concept seems to be well suited. A PL that
>> was quite popular in real-time applications decades ago
>> (I am ignorant of its current status) is Pearl.
>
>
> Surely you can't be talking about Larry Wall's "perl",
> which is not at all suited for real-time applications.
> So what *are* you referring to?
No. See http://www.irt.uni-hannover.de/pearl/pearl-gb.html
It's development was supported/pushed mostly by some people
in Germany. At the time I happened to know a tiny little bit
about it there were also a couple of other real-time PLs
in use in the industry. I have forgotten their names, however.
M. K. Shen
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: David Eather: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
