Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 12/22/04
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Michael Jørgensen: "Re: re:Algorithm"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: Joe Peschel: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:40:43 +0100
Joe Peschel wrote:
> Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote in
> news:cqacvo$2ha$05$1@news.t-online.com:
>
>
>>
>>Joe Peschel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
>>
>>>>Do you
>>>>think it is good that one confounds personal matters with
>>>>scientific stuff or even 'intentionally' utilizes scientific
>>>>discussion as a convenient vehicle to launch personal attacks?
>>>>
>>>
>>>You've launched quite a few personal attacks yourself.
>>
>>I had sinned myself previously (cf. e.g. some exchange of
>>posts with Tom St Denis).But in one thread sometime ago
>>I apologized for having written in my posts personal
>>stuff (even though I in another concurrent thread wrote
>>against such) and have since put up a warning sign on my
>>desk cautioning me against repeating such sins.
>>
>
>
> Not to mention personal attacks against Olson quite recently, Gwyn, and,
> according to Google, me, when I had your postings kill-filed.
I don't remember I had attacked you personally in the
real sense of the word. Do you still remember the sort
of words I employed? Thanks in advance for helping me
correcting my behaviour.
M. K. Shen
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Michael Jørgensen: "Re: re:Algorithm"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: Joe Peschel: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
