Re: "recovering" passwords
From: Volker Hetzer (volker.hetzer_at_ieee.org)
Date: 12/21/04
- Next message: Volker Hetzer: "Re: "recovering" passwords"
- Previous message: karl malbrain: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Developwebsites: "Re: "recovering" passwords"
- Next in thread: Volker Hetzer: "Re: "recovering" passwords"
- Reply: Volker Hetzer: "Re: "recovering" passwords"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:50:19 +0100
"Developwebsites" <developwebsites@aol.comBATSPAM> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:20041221123321.12288.00002447@mb-m28.aol.com...
> >
> >They're all designed so that you'll have to check all possible keys
> >(derived in some way from your pass-phrase), and they make this
> >impossible (with any computer with todays computingpower) by making the
> >number of keys large enougth.
>
> huh?
> If a password is 482, DES, Blowfish, AES, etc. is not going to stop me from
> trying all numbers in a loop from 1 to 999.
Yes, so? I still don't see your point here. Why do you always insist in these
stupid passwords? The difference between blowfish ans AES comes to light
when your password could be "w_edfjlk675$! /.}:iue%wazbv!/*-+A~\:Xfhg
jklIUOpo;ik[pkJjh.HHG<685".
Given a plaintext and corresponding ciphertext you can crack it if you are using
DES but you can't crack it using AES.
Lots of Greetings!
Volker
- Next message: Volker Hetzer: "Re: "recovering" passwords"
- Previous message: karl malbrain: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Developwebsites: "Re: "recovering" passwords"
- Next in thread: Volker Hetzer: "Re: "recovering" passwords"
- Reply: Volker Hetzer: "Re: "recovering" passwords"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|