Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: Xcott Craver (caj_at_B-r-a-i-n-H-z.com)
Date: 12/21/04
- Next message: Xcott Craver: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: karl malbrain: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:57:04 GMT
Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
>
>Sure. Certain drugs, for example, in the hands of doctors
>are fine but in the hands of laymen could be deadly.
Exactly; and one of the big problems with computer programmers
is that they tend to analogize themselves to highly skilled
professionals, like surgeons.
Programmers need to get over themselves, and understand that they
are less like doctors, and more like uncertified laypeople trying
to practice medicine with a pre-med degree and a sharp scalpel.
My security and safety depends on whether programmers are too
macho to adopt security and safety measures, on the grounds that
"real programmers" don't need them.
I am also annoyed by programmers analogizing themselves to artists--
apparently programming is an "art" just because it has an aesthetic
component--but that's another peeve entirely.
--X
- Next message: Xcott Craver: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: karl malbrain: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]