Re: XOR and ADD subtil difference ?
From: Arnaud Carré (arnaud.carreNOSPAM_at_freesurf.fr)
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: XOR and ADD subtil difference ?"
- Previous message: Erich Schnoor: "Re: Dynamic "One-time-pad""
- In reply to: Wannabee: "Re: XOR and ADD subtil difference ?"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: XOR and ADD subtil difference ?"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: XOR and ADD subtil difference ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:49:00 +0100
> > Other: AES uses plenty of XOR like many block cyphers. ( let's say on
> 32bits
> > integer in 32bits implementation). What do you think of the security of
a
> > "modifyed" AES using ADD instead of XOR ??
>
> You mean ADD modulo something? ADD modulo what? ADD modulo 2^32 ?
oh yes sorry I don't specify that. Of course I mean "modulo" add, and modulo
the same size used by any XOR ( with one bit register XOR is equivalent to
ADD).
so in the AES 32bits implementation exemple, of course I speak about
replacing integer 32bits XOR by integer 32bits ADD ( so modulo 2^32 )
And don't be worried, that's not because I don't think XOR is not secure !!
:-) It's just therorical knowledge. I want to know if "modulo add" is as
safe as XOR .
Any idea ?
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: XOR and ADD subtil difference ?"
- Previous message: Erich Schnoor: "Re: Dynamic "One-time-pad""
- In reply to: Wannabee: "Re: XOR and ADD subtil difference ?"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: XOR and ADD subtil difference ?"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: XOR and ADD subtil difference ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|