Re: FGK Invariant V for David Scott
From: David A. Scott (daVvid_a_scott_at_email.com)
Date: 11/28/04
- Previous message: Developwebsites: "Winzip's algo vs. WinRar's"
- In reply to: karl_m_at_acm.org: "Re: FGK Invariant V for David Scott"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 Nov 2004 04:48:30 GMT
karl_m@acm.org wrote in
news:1101605738.876788.247130@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
>
>>>From my experience the Burrows Wheeler Transform's direction is toward
> larger blocks rather than a single string. Why do you think the
> opposite?
>
>
I think we are saying the same thing. The single string is a block
that is the size of the file. One block one string.
David A. Scott
-- My Crypto code http://bijective.dogma.net/crypto/scott19u.zip http://www.jim.com/jamesd/Kong/scott19u.zip old version My Compression code http://bijective.dogma.net/ **TO EMAIL ME drop the roman "five" ** Disclaimer:I am in no way responsible for any of the statements made in the above text. For all I know I might be drugged. As a famous person once said "any cryptograhic system is only as strong as its weakest link"
- Previous message: Developwebsites: "Winzip's algo vs. WinRar's"
- In reply to: karl_m_at_acm.org: "Re: FGK Invariant V for David Scott"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]