Re: Don't use S-boxes!
From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 11/24/04
- Next message: betty: "Why HMAC ??????"
- Previous message: Brian Hetrick: "Re: Swapping is inefficient and wasteful"
- In reply to: karl_m_at_acm.org: "Re: Don't use S-boxes!"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Don't use S-boxes!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:13:04 GMT
In article <1101318364.403477.301190@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
karl_m@acm.org says...
> No, its not OFF TOPIC at all. In fact it's the very core of the
> running dispute. My use of capitals dates back to my use of the IBM
> 026 vacuum tube key punch, and thus is covered by the
> PRIOR-USE-DOCTRINE. karl m
Wow, that's the best stretch I've seen in a while to defend kook-speak
behavior.
- Next message: betty: "Why HMAC ??????"
- Previous message: Brian Hetrick: "Re: Swapping is inefficient and wasteful"
- In reply to: karl_m_at_acm.org: "Re: Don't use S-boxes!"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Don't use S-boxes!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
