Re: Padding Question (Cramer-Shoup 98 Crypto System)
Date: 23 Nov 2004 11:00:46 -0800
David A. Scott wrote:
> Oliver Moeller <email@example.com> wrote in
> > My Questions:
> > (1) Is (I) an acceptable way to pad?
> > (2) Is (II) PKCS5 better than padding with 10* ?
> > (3) Is there a suggested or even 'optimal' way to pad?
> > Thanks.
> Yes there are much better ways to pad. You should at least
> always use some form of bijective padding weither or not your
> adding random data.
Do you have additional attributes for bijective? karl m