Re: .NET DES CFB - useless interface?
From: Henrick Hellström (henrick.hellstrm_at_telia.com)
Date: 11/20/04
- Next message: Cameron: "Re: The Mystery of "0x800ccc0d (and all the "0x800ccc0d" variants)"
- Previous message: Morten Dahl: "Re: .NET DES CFB - useless interface?"
- In reply to: Morten Dahl: "Re: .NET DES CFB - useless interface?"
- Next in thread: Peter Gutmann: "Re: .NET DES CFB - useless interface?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 11:44:06 GMT
Morten Dahl wrote:
> You wouldn't happen to have an implementation and/or speed-comparison of
> Serpent (vs. Rijndael)? I've ported the Java source given for the AES
> selection, and this runs at about half the speed of Rijndael; to my
> knownledge this is normal but would like to verify it..
No, sorry, but I assume you are right. There is some demand for TwoFish,
but I hardly ever hear any requests for Serpent. Speed might very well
be one reason Serpent has not caught much attention.
- Next message: Cameron: "Re: The Mystery of "0x800ccc0d (and all the "0x800ccc0d" variants)"
- Previous message: Morten Dahl: "Re: .NET DES CFB - useless interface?"
- In reply to: Morten Dahl: "Re: .NET DES CFB - useless interface?"
- Next in thread: Peter Gutmann: "Re: .NET DES CFB - useless interface?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading