Re: ERH - MSW primality test
From: Paul Leyland (paul_at_leyland.vispa.com)
Date: 11/15/04
- Next message: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Previous message: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- In reply to: Phil Carmody: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Next in thread: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Reply: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 15 Nov 2004 09:17:02 +0000
Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> Sorry. I failed. All I got was a precis by M. C. Wunderlich that says
> "The author concludes with a discussion of another approach to prime
> testing in which the primality of a number passing the test depends
> only on the truth of a generally accepted but unproved hypothesis,
> such as the extended Riemann hypothesis."
>
> Which is worse than useless.
Well, if he ever finds a counter-example he will have disproved the
ERH. That's better than useless. 8-)
Paul
-- Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way. The time is gone, the song is over. Thought I'd something more to say.
- Next message: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Previous message: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- In reply to: Phil Carmody: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Next in thread: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Reply: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|