Re: ERH - MSW primality test
From: Phil Carmody (thefatphil_demunged_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 11/15/04
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Previous message: Richard Outerbridge: "Re: Bruce Shneier's DES"
- In reply to: Phil Carmody: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Next in thread: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 15 Nov 2004 02:50:19 +0200
Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> Note that C&P has the 2.ln(n)^2 expression as a bound for
> Strong Pseudoprimility tests. The paper doesn't even use
> such strong tests, it's basically half-way between a
> Fermat Test and a Euler Test (+/-1, don't care which one).
Just for reference (and you probably know this) your n is not
even a 2-SPRP!
The Euler test yields +1, but one step earlier gives
sqrt(1) == 120096492 (mod n)
not +/-1.
So real Miller (see dissertation's 3.11 = C&P 3.4.1) knocks this
composite on the head immediately!
Phil
-- They no longer do my traditional winks tournament lunch - liver and bacon. It's just what you need during a winks tournament lunchtime to replace lost ... liver. -- Anthony Horton, 2004/08/27 at the Cambridge 'Long Vac.'
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Previous message: Richard Outerbridge: "Re: Bruce Shneier's DES"
- In reply to: Phil Carmody: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Next in thread: Cristiano: "Re: ERH - MSW primality test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|