Re: How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 10/31/04
- Previous message: JiXian Yang: "How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- In reply to: JiXian Yang: "How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- Reply: JiXian Yang: "Re: How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 06:26:19 -0500
JiXian Yang wrote:
> IF MD5(MD5(DATA)) is not stronger than MD5(DATA)£¬
> suppose there is a new hash algorithm NewHash(DATA) stronger than MD5(DATA).
> How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?
Why does this question come up every 6 months.
Why would you think MD5 o MD5 would be stronger than MD5 [supposedly
against finding collisions, though you could have meant against inversion]
Tom
- Previous message: JiXian Yang: "How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- In reply to: JiXian Yang: "How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- Reply: JiXian Yang: "Re: How about MD5(NewHash(DATA))?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]