Re: determining algorithm used
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: John M. Gamble: "Re: determining algorithm used"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Khufu] Pre-Computing the S-Boxes and obtaining aux. keys"
- In reply to: WTShaw_1_at_hotmail.com: "Re: determining algorithm used"
- Next in thread: John M. Gamble: "Re: determining algorithm used"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:56:28 +0200
WTShaw_1@hotmail.com wrote:
> One could misdirect an attack to another cipher by saying falsely is
> what it isn't or bury the quest for cipher identity by looking very
> ordinary like using only 26 different characters in five character
> groups. As might be recalled, I have worked out fairly good ways to
> do the later from any existing ciphertext of any N set.
Misleading the opponent is certainly a 'legitimate' means in
the realm of security. In the same vein, entirely nonsensical
stuff could be rendered 'cryptic'. There is a rather recent
paper in Cryptologia arguing for the hypothesis that the
Voynich manuscript is a pure hoax.
M. K. Shen
- Next message: John M. Gamble: "Re: determining algorithm used"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Khufu] Pre-Computing the S-Boxes and obtaining aux. keys"
- In reply to: WTShaw_1_at_hotmail.com: "Re: determining algorithm used"
- Next in thread: John M. Gamble: "Re: determining algorithm used"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
