Re: A quote concerning randomness

From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 10/16/04 

Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:36:30 +0200

Bill Unruh wrote:

> Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> writes:
[snip]

> No. It just means that noone bothered writing a rebuttal. Also for a
> comment, some journals demand that the comments must point out critical
> errors in the paper-- extentions to the paper go into a separate paper.
> But most people do not have the time to write a rebuttal to every paper
> they disagree with. They have their own more interesting work to carry out.

How do you deduce that 'It just means that noone bothered writing
a rebuttal'? If everything in the journal is indeed correct, how
could one write a (justified) rebuttal at all??

M. K. Shen

Quantcast