Re: Coloring of a map
From: Guy Macon (http://www.guymacon.com)
Date: 10/15/04
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:50:45 +0100
Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> says...
>Traditional logic is two-valued. You have either true or
>false. I don't think that such logic applies to all situations
>in the real world. I suppose that's a point that one has
>to take into consideration.
Nothing you wrote above changes the fact that you have been
engaging in a logical fallacy that is so well-known that it
is listed in the encyclopedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_silence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_fallacy
It's a fallacy. It's an invalid argument. It is that which departs
from being logical. It's wrong-headed. It makes you look like a fool
every time you use it. It proves nothing. It wastes the reader's
time with statements that have no real content. Stop it. Don't use
the argument from silence ever again. Drop it from your bag of
debating tricks. It does not work anymore. Don't make excuses or
rationalizations - just stop doing it.
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Coloring of a map"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]