Re: new /dev/random
From: Paul Rubin (//phr.cx_at_NOSPAM.invalid)
Date: 10/12/04
- Next message: BRG: "Re: Crypto implementation in consumer encryption software"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: new /dev/random"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 12 Oct 2004 01:55:01 -0700
Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> writes:
> There are 169 combinations k,x at each nibble.
Actually you get an even greater advantage (at least 1/9) by using
2-bit "niblets" with 3 values instead of 4-bit nibbles with 13 values.
I was originally going in another direction with the 4-bit nibbles.
- Next message: BRG: "Re: Crypto implementation in consumer encryption software"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: new /dev/random"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
