Re: new /dev/random
From: Bill Unruh (unruh_at_string.physics.ubc.ca)
Date: 10/09/04
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Quantum Computers breaking ciphers"
- Previous message: DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre: "Re: How to write a paker/unpaker not subject to generic crac ?"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Next in thread: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 9 Oct 2004 01:16:16 GMT
daw@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) writes:
]Bill Unruh wrote:
]>I just did a grep of all of the files in the kernel code looking for
]>urandom.
]get_random_bytes()
]Maybe there are other internal interfaces for all I know.
Fair enough. Lots more calls to that function.
In fact lots of interfaces even in random.c. My observation, although true,
was irrelevant.
( reminds me of that old Microsoft joke-- pilot to skyscraper "where am I?"
Skyscraper to pilot "Here". Pilot to self "Must be Microsoft headquarters.
Answer perfectly true and completely unhelpful")
Sorry.
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Quantum Computers breaking ciphers"
- Previous message: DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre: "Re: How to write a paker/unpaker not subject to generic crac ?"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Next in thread: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]