Re: A few questions about C programming.
From: DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre (nntp_pipex_at_demaine.info)
Date: 10/07/04
- Next message: DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre: "Re: A few questions about C programming."
- Previous message: Scott: "Re: Question Based Encryption"
- In reply to: Colin Andrew Percival: "Re: A few questions about C programming."
- Next in thread: Roger Schlafly: "Re: A few questions about C programming."
- Reply: Roger Schlafly: "Re: A few questions about C programming."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:52:01 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
| Well, maybe he wants to have more points at which the cryptosystem is
| non-analytic? After all, the fact that AES has such a polynomial
| structure has led people to worry about potential weaknesses... :-)
|
| I think what the OP wants is to create an AES' which is different from
| AES but functionally equivalent, in order that if at some point in the
| future an AES-breaking program becomes widely available, breaking his
| AES' will still require some knowledge on the part of the cryptanalyst.
| (Which at very least would provide protection against trained-monkey
| attacks.)
|
| To the OP: Read the AES paper. The authors discuss several *arbitrary*
| choices which they made. Change some of those.
You got it 99.99%.
just read my post I did today at 03:43 ( London time), and you
understand it.
All i want is to be able to generate an algorythm generator which
products can stand against 'trained-monkey'.
As long as I keep the generator secret, nobody should be able to write a
generic crac against algorythm my generator will produce in nte future.
I do not aim to protect secrets against any government. I just want
exhaustive scan to take at least 1 month on a singular p4 4G, and write
of generic crak as difficult as possible
- --
DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre http:/www.demaine.info/
\_o< apt-get remove ispell >o_/
There're 10 types of people: those who can count in binary and those who
can't
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBZHcRGWSTLbOSw8IRAhhgAKCjyMU1z3BrVZEcSjszQFEFD8JdJACZAcCs
XCVqaJkGmaz4e3sjG3gLDPk=
=FoPW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre: "Re: A few questions about C programming."
- Previous message: Scott: "Re: Question Based Encryption"
- In reply to: Colin Andrew Percival: "Re: A few questions about C programming."
- Next in thread: Roger Schlafly: "Re: A few questions about C programming."
- Reply: Roger Schlafly: "Re: A few questions about C programming."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|