Can SHA-1 produce dupe hash values?
From: car (car_member_at_newsguy.com)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Any truth to rumor that NSA had Public Key Crypto first?"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: Any truth to rumor that NSA had Public Key Crypto first?"
- Next in thread: Damian Menscher: "Re: Can SHA-1 produce dupe hash values?"
- Reply: Damian Menscher: "Re: Can SHA-1 produce dupe hash values?"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: Can SHA-1 produce dupe hash values?"
- Reply: Martin Bodenstedt: "Re: Can SHA-1 produce dupe hash values?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Sep 2004 09:20:42 -0700
Hi, all! I am in an area that processes customer transaction records. To keep
me (the data collection and manipulation service) from being able to see real
customer IDs, the transaction source has implemented SHA-1 with "salt" to
produce one-way hash text. I see the resulting hash value as the customer ID.
I have been told that the way they are encrypting the customer ID, the resulting
text will be consistent and distinct. They said it is practically impossible to
get the same hash value for two different IDs. Is that true of the
implementation of SHA-1 with the same salt every time? Does it matter what the
length of the customer id is (too short, too long)?
I am on a quick deadline to implement the handling the customer IDs (all old IDs
have to be deleted), so I do not have much time to check out SHA-1 in dpeth, but
I thought I remember hearing that one-way hashes could produce the same output
for two different inputs - is that true? I just want to know how sure I can be
that these hash texts will uniquely identify one and only one customer. It is
OK for me to associate a customer's data together for analysis (customers who
bought x also bought y within 30 days, etc), the restriction is on my putting
transactions to an actual named John Doe. Since we got rid of the customer
detail tables, the restriction is a mute point.
Funny, my question is not how secure is the method, but instead how reliably
unique is the result of the method...
Thanks to all who can lend some hard facts/stats...
- car
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Any truth to rumor that NSA had Public Key Crypto first?"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: Any truth to rumor that NSA had Public Key Crypto first?"
- Next in thread: Damian Menscher: "Re: Can SHA-1 produce dupe hash values?"
- Reply: Damian Menscher: "Re: Can SHA-1 produce dupe hash values?"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: Can SHA-1 produce dupe hash values?"
- Reply: Martin Bodenstedt: "Re: Can SHA-1 produce dupe hash values?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|