Re: MACs need to pay attention to small-packet performance
From: D. J. Bernstein (djb_at_cr.yp.to)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Guy Macon: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: MACs need to pay attention to small-packet performance"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: MACs need to pay attention to small-packet performance"
- Next in thread: Thomas Pornin: "Re: MACs need to pay attention to small-packet performance"
- Reply: Thomas Pornin: "Re: MACs need to pay attention to small-packet performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 01:36:41 +0000 (UTC)
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Some of us want to use AES to encrypt file systems, not networks.
So you're trying to limit the damage when you lose your laptop? And
you're reading 1 gigabit per second continuously from your laptop disk?
And this ludicrously uncommon situation is a reasonable benchmark for
secret-key cryptography---whereas it's unreasonable to consider people
trying to protect themselves against 1Gbps denial-of-service attacks?
---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
- Next message: Guy Macon: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: MACs need to pay attention to small-packet performance"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: MACs need to pay attention to small-packet performance"
- Next in thread: Thomas Pornin: "Re: MACs need to pay attention to small-packet performance"
- Reply: Thomas Pornin: "Re: MACs need to pay attention to small-packet performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]