Re: new /dev/random
From: Bill Unruh (unruh_at_string.physics.ubc.ca)
Date: 09/25/04
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Re: Basic question"
- Previous message: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: new /dev/random"
- In reply to: Joris Dobbelsteen: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 25 Sep 2004 01:14:00 GMT
"Joris Dobbelsteen" <joris.dobbelsteen@mail.com> writes:
]"Bill Unruh" <unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca> wrote in message
]news:cj0djh$dhi$1@nntp.itservices.ubc.ca...
]>
]> Yes, everyone failed to convince you that what was wanted for
]> /dev/random was an RNG not another PRNG.
]Indeed, /dev/random should be the RNG integrated into some Intel chipsets or
]the on-chip RNG on the current Via C3 processor.
]It will (most likely) be more widely accepted. And finally some hardware
]might be put to good use.
The current /dev/random uses timing info from the mouse, the disks, the
keyboard, etc to provide the the true random information for the RNG. And
it blocks (stops feeding out data) if it does not have enough randomness.
urandom is a PRNG fed from /dev/random for seeding and occasional injection
of true randomness. Our friend objects, and wants to convert /dev/random
into a PRNG for reasons he has failed to convince anyone but himself of.
He has a very weak understanding of the difference between an RNG and a
PRNG.
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Re: Basic question"
- Previous message: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: new /dev/random"
- In reply to: Joris Dobbelsteen: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: new /dev/random"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|