Re: Size of a new hash standard
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Jiang Wu: "Re: a problem combined with DLP and CDH"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Public Key encryption - using cryptlib"
- In reply to: Alan: "Re: Size of a new hash standard"
- Next in thread: Alan: "Re: Size of a new hash standard"
- Reply: Alan: "Re: Size of a new hash standard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:59:28 GMT
Alan wrote:
> Eris Pluvia <eris_pluviaNOSPAM@yahoo.es> wrote in message news:<2r90bcF180jt8U1@uni-berlin.de>...
>
>>As far as I understand, if the background hash function is weak, the
>>strength of further block cipher does not prevent collisions.
>
>
> Here are some papers which illustrate what I'm talking about:
>
> http://dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw/research/crypto/HTML/PDF/C94/129.PDF
> http://dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw/research/crypto/HTML/PDF/C95/15.PDF
Those papers are not public domain and hosting them like that violates
the IACRs copyright on the publications. You might want to think twice
about linking to that.
Tom
- Next message: Jiang Wu: "Re: a problem combined with DLP and CDH"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Public Key encryption - using cryptlib"
- In reply to: Alan: "Re: Size of a new hash standard"
- Next in thread: Alan: "Re: Size of a new hash standard"
- Reply: Alan: "Re: Size of a new hash standard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
