Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?
From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn_at_null.net)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Previous message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- In reply to: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:34:48 -0400
Bryan Olson wrote:
> Progress is made funeral by funeral.
What I see is rather that the same old mistakes
keep being reinvented, in new contexts, by those
who haven't learned lessons from the history of
the field. And not just in computing.
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Previous message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- In reply to: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|