Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?
From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn_at_null.net)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Previous message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:45:26 -0400
Paul Rubin wrote:
> How do you know that?
Well, of course I left out some details.
The example was meant for a context in which
the variable a was *declared* as an array.
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Previous message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]