Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?
From: Paul Rubin (//phr.cx_at_NOSPAM.invalid)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: A basic question about hashing"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 13 Sep 2004 17:07:37 -0700
"Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> writes:
> for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
> /* code that doesn't modify i */
> something(a[i]);
> /* code that doesn't modify i */
> } /*assert: ...*/
> clearly performs that "something" exactly once on
> each element of a[0..(n-1)],
How do you know that? Maybe the loop modifies a, so that a[3] is at a
different address depending on which iteration of the loop is running.
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: A basic question about hashing"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: "Perfect" or "Provable" security both crypto and non-crypto?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]