Re: Against sofware piracy! EXECryptor 2.034 update
From: John Savard (jsavard_at_excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid)
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:13:01 GMT
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:21:52 -0500, Jeff Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org>
wrote, in part:
>My reading agrees with yours - doesn't provide copy protection, just
>protection against reverse engineering.
Yes, but protection against reverse engineering is precisely what is
needed to ensure that any copy protection scheme can't be trivially
bypassed. I can't criticize the announcement for omitting a statement of
what should be obvious.