Re: elgamal homomorphy
From: Johansson Goerik (jgoerik_at_msn.se)
Date: 09/01/04
- Next message: Guy Macon: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- Previous message: Kev: "Interlude"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: elgamal homomorphy"
- Next in thread: Alex: "Re: elgamal homomorphy"
- Reply: Alex: "Re: elgamal homomorphy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:46:00 +0200
Hi,
I would say it is only multiplicative homomorph, am I right?
"Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@iahu.ca> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:aNiZc.248$Rge.23@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> Johansson Goerik wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a really beginner question. Is ElGamal a additive or
multiplicative
> > homorphic encryption scheme?
>
> Why not work it out? What are the requirements for it to be additive and
> multiplicative?
>
> But I'll give a hint... (x^y)^z is the same as x^(y*z) ;-)
>
> Tom
- Next message: Guy Macon: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- Previous message: Kev: "Interlude"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: elgamal homomorphy"
- Next in thread: Alex: "Re: elgamal homomorphy"
- Reply: Alex: "Re: elgamal homomorphy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]