Re: strengthening /dev/urandom
From: Guy Macon (http://www.guymacon.com)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:57:44 -0700
Ernst Lippe <email@example.com> says...
>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:11:10 -0700, Guy Macon wrote:
>> Ernst Lippe <firstname.lastname@example.org> says...
>>>Your definition for a TRNG seems far too strict,
>> What should I call a perfectly random source of data when that's what I
>> wish to talk about?
>The term "perfect" seems very suitable, after all most
>crypto terms that contain the word perfect are not very
Got it. Perfect Random Number Generator = PRNG. Thanks!
(GUY runs for cover as everyone throws things at him...)
Seriously, I find myself to be quite reluctant to call the output of
even the finest Hardware RNGs "True Random." That seems to imply a
perfection that I, as an EE, know does not exist.
-- Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com>