Re: XOR without repeated key
From: Guy Macon (http://www.guymacon.com)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: Guy Macon: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Reply: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:15:04 -0700
Joe Peschel <jpeschel@no.spam.org> says...
>
>Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com> wrote:
>
>> Joe Peschel <jpeschel@no.spam.org> says...
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>> Wrong.
>
>I suppose you think you're making a point by appropriating my one word
>answer.
Lighten up. I was just trying to get a chuckle out of you.
>I guess you still haven't figured out why Tim's comment was wrong.
>It >ought to be obvious, but since it isn't obvious to you, I'll
>tell you why
If something is obviously wrong, seeing a Joe Peschel one-word reply
doesn't make it any more or less obviously wrong. If something is
not obviously wrong, seeing a Joe Peschel one-word reply doesn't
make it any more or less obviously wrong either. Your one-word
"wrong" replies are devoid of content that wasn't there before you
posted, and thus are a waste of time.
- Next message: Guy Macon: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Reply: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]