Re: XOR without repeated key
From: Joe Peschel (jpeschel_at_no.spam.org)
Date: 08/28/04
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- In reply to: Guy Macon: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:37:53 -0000
Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com> wrote in
news:10ivaacskv81m6b@news.supernews.com:
>
> Joe Peschel <jpeschel@no.spam.org> says...
>>
>>Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com> wrote in
>>news:10iusur26685025@news.supernews.com:
>>
>>> Unless you are correcting Tim Smith's minor omission (the key has to be
>>> random, secret, and used once, not just random)
>>
>>Minor omission?
>
> By "minor" I mean "likely to be assumed by the reader."
Ha! That's quite a definition for "minor."
> for example,
> most sci.crypt posts omit the fact that you should keep your key secret.
>
Yes, I think most sci.crypt readers would grant, in this case, that the key
is secret. What puzzles me is this: why do some of the readers here assume
that the cipher Robert mentions is a one-time pad? All he has said is that
the key is as long as the ciphertext, and the key is XORed against the
plaintext. He hasn't said how that key was generated. He hasn't said that
the key is used only once. Robert's cipher sounds like a stream cipher akin
to RC-4 to me. It could be a classical cipher, too.
J
-- __________________________________________ When will Bush be tried for war crimes? "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." --G. W. B. Joe Peschel D.O.E. SysWorks http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm __________________________________________
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- In reply to: Guy Macon: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: XOR without repeated key"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|