Re: strengthening /dev/urandom
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 08/20/04
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:49:54 +0200
Tom St Denis wrote:
> Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com> wrote:
>>The point being that it is easy to make a good entropy estimator if
>>you understand the physics of your entropy source, and that you have
>
>
> Our point is what if I swap your coin with a weighted one [this argument
> works better with a die]?
How about then the case where the opponent intercepts
/dev/random and supplies bits of his own? Note that Macon
wrote the word 'understand', that implies that you know what
the situation (currently) really is. (That's one reason
why I consider a reliable software estimator to be hard to
realize.)
M. K. Shen
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: strengthening /dev/urandom"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|