Re: Cryptogram Comment
From: John Savard (jsavard_at_excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: Ilya O. Levin: "Re: simple and efficient PRG"
- Previous message: Matt Mahoney: "Re: Entropy and Equivalent Key Lengths?"
- In reply to: Undisclosed: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Next in thread: Undisclosed: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Undisclosed: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:11:19 GMT
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:53:51 -0400, Undisclosed <nomail@dontbeaweaselspammer.com>
wrote, in part:
>this is not going to hurt them financially in the slightest.
Without getting into the debate as a whole, *if* it were the case that one could
not connect an unpatched machine to the Internet for five minutes before it
crashed from either Blaster or Sasser, *then* an unpatchable Windows XP
installation would be useless for connecting to the Internet. Presumably, this
might discourage some piracy.
John Savard
http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html
- Next message: Ilya O. Levin: "Re: simple and efficient PRG"
- Previous message: Matt Mahoney: "Re: Entropy and Equivalent Key Lengths?"
- In reply to: Undisclosed: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Next in thread: Undisclosed: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Undisclosed: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|