Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler (lynn_at_garlic.com)
Date: 08/06/04
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Previous message: Michael Anshel: "Re: Parker Vectors, Permutation Groups and Generalized Conjugacy"
- In reply to: Allen Pulsifer: "New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Reply: Allen Pulsifer: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:05:10 -0600
amicrypt@amishare.com (Allen Pulsifer) writes:
> Enclosed is a paper discussing a new method to authenticate the
> exchange of public keys without using digital certificates. The
> protocol has one step involving human intervention, specifically, it
> requires human operators to verify the identity of one another and
> compare two short strings.
>
> The primary use for this protocol would be to bootstrap a secure
> channel. Remarkably, we have found no papers or documented
> protocols on how to achieve this.
no documented protocols for secure key exchange or no documented
protocols for secure public key exchange.
in general there is a lot written on secure or out-of-band channels
for secure key exchange ... mostly having to do with symmetric keys.
i just finished some comments (in another n.g.) about asymmetric
vis-a-vis symmetric with regard to this subject:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#47
the issue for symmetric key exchange is both hiding the keys and can
the exchange be trusted ... while asymmetric key exchange may
eliminate hiding the keys ... but doesn't eliminate the problem.
In fact, all the root trust keys ... even in PKI & digital
certificates paradigm have this issue ... however, frequently they
leave the issue of how the environment is initially populated with the
initial root trust keys as an exercise for the student (or it is taken
for granted as magically happening).
at its simplest ... one could claim that the whole PGP environment
implements such an infrastructure ... the ability to perform public
key exchange w/o requiring certificates from certification authorities
trust roots.
as an aside ... i've long advocated "naked" public keys and that
certificates frequently are redundant and superfluous.
-- Anne & Lynn Wheeler | http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Previous message: Michael Anshel: "Re: Parker Vectors, Permutation Groups and Generalized Conjugacy"
- In reply to: Allen Pulsifer: "New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Reply: Allen Pulsifer: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|